Ethiopian Consulate in Garowe, Puntland, Somalia has facilitated the visit of Ethiopian top military officers to visit Puntland State recently. Let’s be clear—you are not just observing a diplomatic nuance. You are identifying a deliberate strategy of political camouflage.
Ethiopia did not send high-profile diplomats to Garowe by accident. It chose uniforms over suits for a reason.
The Optics Game: Intervention Without Looking Like It
For Ethiopia, perception is everything.
Sending senior diplomats to Puntland would have:
Triggered accusations of direct interference in Somali internal affairs
Provoked political backlash from Mogadishu
Escalated an already fragile federal tension
So Addis Ababa made a calculated move:
1.  It avoided sending top diplomats precisely to escape the perception of political intervention.
2. Instead, it deployed senior military officers to frame the engagement as regional security cooperation.
This is not accidental—it is designed for ambiguity.
Military Channels: The Perfect Cover
Military-to-military engagement provides:
A neutral-sounding justification (security, counterterrorism)
Lower diplomatic visibility
Operational flexibility without political headlines
But beneath that cover, discussions often extend to:
Strategic infrastructure (including Gara’ad Port)
Trade corridors and logistics
Long-term influence arrangements
In essence: Hard politics, wrapped in soft security language
Gara’ad: The Silent Anchor of the Strategy
Gara’ad port on the Indian Ocean is not mentioned in communiqués—but it is central.
It represents:
Ethiopia’s future maritime outlet
A strategic alternative to Djibouti dependency
A foothold in the Indian Ocean geopolitical space
Military engagement ensures:
When Gara’ad rises in importance, Ethiopia is already embedded in its security and operational ecosystem
Garowe as a Strategic Theatre
Garowe is no longer just an administrative hub—it is becoming a quiet diplomatic capital.
Without formal recognition, without headlines:
External actors engage directly
Strategic decisions are shaped
Power is negotiated outside traditional channels
The Message to Villa Somalia
This approach sends a calibrated signal to Villa Somalia:
Ethiopia is not openly violating diplomatic norms
But it is not constrained by them either
It respects the form of sovereignty while quietly reshaping its substance
WDM VERDICT
This is not restraint.
This is a refinement of strategy.
Diplomats would have exposed the move as political
Military officers repackage it as security
The objective—influence, access, and leverage—remains unchanged
2.  Ethiopia did not step back.
3. It simply changed the language of engagement
And Puntland?
It stands at the intersection of:
Security cooperation
Economic opportunity (Gara’ad)
Geopolitical competition
Final Line
When intervention wears a uniform, it no longer looks like intervention—
it looks like cooperation.

—–
Support WAPMEN — the home of fearless, independent journalism that speaks truth to power across Somalia and the region. Tel/WhatsApp: +252 90 703 4081

In the theatre of Somali politics, loyalty is rarely permanent, and betrayal is never forgotten. The unfolding drama in Southwest is not an accident—it is a consequence. A delayed bill finally presented. And in Baidoa, the political chickens have indeed come home to roost.
For years, the leadership of Southwest State, under Abdiaziz Hassan Mohamed Laftagareen, operated not as a pillar of federalism but as an extension of central power. Respect—both from the Somali public and within the federal architecture—is not granted by title; it is earned through principle. And Southwest, regrettably, traded principle for proximity to power.
Let us not forget the political symbolism of Baidoa once being floated as a “temporary capital” of Somalia. It was less a strategic national vision and more a fleeting political experiment—one that neither inspired national consensus nor commanded institutional respect. It exposed a deeper problem: the absence of legitimacy rooted in the will of the people.
The more consequential misstep, however, was not symbolic—it was constitutional.
When the 2012 Provisional Constitution emerged as a fragile but vital covenant among Somalis, it represented something rare: consensus after collapse. It was not perfect, but it was shared. It was the political glue holding together a broken state. And yet, in the face of unilateral amendments and federal overreach by Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, Southwest did not stand as a defender of that covenant. It aligned. It endorsed. It legitimized.
That decision has now come full circle.
Because power, once centralized, does not distinguish between allies and adversaries—it consumes both. The same machinery of overreach that Southwest once enabled has now turned its gaze inward. The illusion of protection under Villa Somalia has evaporated. What remains is the stark realization that political submission does not buy security—it only delays vulnerability.
And yet, here lies the paradox.
In this late hour, Laftagareen has shown a flicker of resistance. A moment—however belated—of political clarity. Standing up to Hassan Sheikh Mohamud now is not just an act of defiance; it is an implicit admission that the earlier path was flawed. That federal overreach is real. That the system Southwest helped empower is now tightening around it.
This shift deserves recognition—but not romanticization.
Because credibility in politics is cumulative. It is built over time and eroded just as steadily. One act of resistance cannot erase years of accommodation. But it can mark a turning point—if, and only if, it is sustained.
The real question is not whether Laftagareen stood up today. The real question is whether Southwest is prepared to redefine its role in Somalia’s federal order going forward:
Will it become a defender of constitutionalism and consensus?
Or will this be another temporary posture in the endless cycle of political survival?
Somalia stands at a dangerous crossroads. The erosion of the 2012 constitutional framework, the normalization of unilateralism, and the weakening of federal member states are not isolated events—they are interconnected symptoms of a deeper crisis.
Baidoa is not just a city in this story. It is a warning.
A warning that political convenience has consequences.
A warning that silence in the face of overreach eventually becomes complicity.
And a warning that those who help dismantle consensus should not be surprised when they are left without it.
If Southwest truly seeks respect—from its people and from the nation—it must now do what it failed to do before: stand firmly, consistently, and unapologetically for the constitutional order it once helped undermine.
Because in Somali politics, redemption is possible.
But it is never free.