WARSAME POLICY & MEDIA NETWORK (WAPMEN)
Commentary and Critical Analysis
In thirteen days, the clock runs out.
The mandate of President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud will expire—not symbolically, not politically, but constitutionally. And yet, in the corridors of Villa Somalia, there is a familiar whisper dressed as legality: “caretaker government.”
Let us be clear from the outset: not every government that overstays its mandate qualifies to become a caretaker. Some become something far more dangerous—an unconstitutional residue clinging to power.
From Constitutional Guardian to Constitutional Violator
The tragedy of this administration is not merely that its time is ending. It is that, during its tenure, it has treated the **Provisional Constitution of Somalia 2012 not as a binding covenant, but as a political tool—stretched, amended, and manipulated without consensus.
Federalism, the fragile glue holding Somalia together, has been weaponized rather than nurtured. Instead of being a neutral arbiter among Federal Member States, Villa Somalia has behaved like a partisan actor—rewarding allies, isolating dissenters, and deepening mistrust across the political landscape.
A government that divides cannot unite.
A government that violates cannot supervise.
And yet, we are told it should now act as a caretaker—a neutral referee overseeing the very transition it has already distorted.
The Caretaker Myth: Neutrality Without Credibility
A caretaker government, by definition, must be:
Politically neutral
Constitutionally restrained
Broadly trusted
This administration is none of the above.
Neutrality is not declared—it is earned.
Restraint is not promised—it is practiced.
Trust is not demanded—it is granted.
What Somalia faces today is not a caretaker arrangement, but the attempted rebranding of a contested authority into a legitimate transitional custodian.
This is not continuity. This is camouflage.
A Familiar Script: The Ghost of 2021
Somalis have seen this movie before.
When former President Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaaji attempted to extend his mandate in 2021, the result was not stability—it was armed confrontation in the streets of Mogadishu, a fractured security apparatus, and the near collapse of the state.
The lesson was supposed to be simple:
No incumbent can unilaterally control the transition that determines its own survival.
But lessons in Somali politics are rarely learned—they are recycled.
Power Without Mandate Is Not Governance—It Is Occupation
Once a mandate expires, authority does not magically transform into legitimacy. It evaporates—unless renewed through consensus.
What remains is not governance. It is power without permission.
And power without permission, in any constitutional order, is indistinguishable from political occupation.
To allow such an authority to:
Manage elections
Reshape institutions
Control security forces
is to invite a predetermined outcome disguised as a democratic process.
The Federal Fault Line: A Country Already Divided
Somalia today is not a unified political space. It is a negotiated union of mistrust.
Federal Member States are already fragmented. Some are aligned, others alienated. The center no longer commands confidence—it provokes suspicion.
In such a context, an expired and contested administration acting as caretaker does not stabilize the system—it accelerates its fragmentation.
The risk is no longer theoretical:
Parallel political processes
Competing claims of legitimacy
Security breakdown along federal lines
This is how states unravel—not with a bang, but with a disputed transition.
What Must Be Done: Containment, Not Continuation
Somalia does not need a deceptive caretaker. It needs a contained transition.
That means:
1. Immediate Political Agreement
A negotiated framework between the Federal Government and Federal Member States—before the mandate expires, not after the crisis erupts.
2. Strict Caretaker Limits
If the incumbent remains temporarily, its powers must be:
Narrowly defined
Publicly agreed
Internationally monitored
No constitutional changes. No security manipulation. No political engineering.
3. Independent Electoral Mechanism
The body organizing elections must not be controlled by the incumbent. Anything less is electoral theater.
4. Guarantees Against Abuse
Internal and external guarantees must ensure compliance—not promises, but enforcement.
Final Word: Somalia at the Edge of Legitimacy
This is not just about one man or one administration. It is about the survival of constitutional order in Somalia.
If expired power is allowed to reinvent itself as caretaker authority without consensus, then the Constitution becomes meaningless—and elections become rituals of control, not instruments of choice.
Somalia stands at a familiar crossroads:
One path leads to negotiated transition and fragile stability
The other leads to unilateralism, fragmentation, and crisis
The difference will not be decided by law alone—but by the courage to confront illegitimacy, even when it wears the mask of continuity.
An expired mandate cannot midwife a legitimate future.
Support WDM — the home of fearless, independent journalism that speaks truth to power across Somalia and the region. Tel/WhatsApp: +252 90 703 4081.