PUNTLAND STATE HAS TWO OPTIONS LEFT TO REMAIN IN THE SOMALI UNION

The defense of territorial sovereignty against foreign or extremist threats is a matter of utmost gravity. For years, the Puntland State of Somalia has borne the brunt of countering violent extremist groups, including ISIS and Al-Shabab, in the northeastern regions of Somalia. Despite these efforts, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has yet to provide meaningful support to Puntland’s forces in this critical struggle. This absence of collaboration exacerbates longstanding grievances, including concerns over the FGS’s adherence to the Provisional Federal Constitution, perceived economic marginalization, and policies disproportionately affecting Puntland’s residents.

These tensions unfold against the backdrop of Puntland’s decades-long contributions to stabilizing Somalia and rebuilding governance structures after state collapse. Documented evidence underscores the human and material sacrifices made by Puntland’s people and institutions. Recent developments on the frontlines, however, highlight a troubling pattern of federal disengagement. Many in Puntland perceive the current administration’s failure to fulfill constitutional obligations as a dereliction of duty—a serious charge that merits scrutiny by Somalia’s legislative and judicial bodies.

The cumulative effect of these challenges has reignited debates about Puntland’s future within the Somali Federation, particularly following Somaliland’s unilateral declaration of independence in 1991. While remaining in the union with Banadir remains a possibility, the lack of reciprocity in governance and security cooperation has led some to consider alternatives. Any decision will require careful analysis of constitutional, political, and socioeconomic implications to ensure stability for all Somali people. Here are possible options, feasibility and how to go about each one:

1. National Congress for Constitutional Reforms

Feasibility and Challenges:

  • Consensus-Building: A National Congress could foster dialogue, but success hinges on Mogadishu’s willingness to engage. Historical precedents (e.g., 2000 Arta Conference) show mixed results due to clan rivalries and centralization tendencies.
  • Legal Framework: The 2012 Provisional Constitution provides a basis for reform, but amendments require broad political buy-in, including from federal states and Mogadishu.
  • International Support: Mediation by regional bodies (AU, IGAD) or the UN could pressure stakeholders to participate. Civil society and traditional leaders might help legitimize the process.

Steps Forward:

  • Coalition-Building: Partner with other federal states (e.g., Jubaland, Galmudug) to form a united front demanding constitutional dialogue.
  • Preconditions: Secure guarantees for equitable representation and international oversight to ensure Mogadishu’s compliance.
  • Phased Approach: Prioritize urgent issues (resource-sharing, security cooperation) while deferring contentious topics (e.g., electoral models) to later stages.

2. Confederation Model

Feasibility and Challenges:

  • Autonomy vs. Unity: A confederation would grant Puntland greater sovereignty (e.g., independent security forces, fiscal control) while maintaining nominal Somali unity. However, Mogadishu is likely to resist ceding power.
  • Regional Dynamics: Neighboring states (Ethiopia, Kenya) might oppose a confederation if it destabilizes Somalia, though some could tacitly support it to counter Al-Shabab.
  • Constitutional Hurdles: Transitioning from federalism to confederalism requires redefining the social contract, potentially through a referendum or inter-state treaty.

Steps Forward:

  • Draft a Framework: Propose a confederal constitution outlining shared competencies (e.g., foreign policy, currency) and state-level powers (e.g., taxation, security).
  • Lobby Internationally: Highlight confederation as a stability measure to donors (EU, UAE) wary of state collapse. Emphasize parallels with decentralized models (e.g., UAE’s federalism).
  • Pilot Cooperation: Initiate cross-state projects (e.g., joint counterterrorism operations, trade agreements) to demonstrate confederal benefits.

3. Declaration of Independence

Feasibility and Challenges:

  • Legal and Diplomatic Barriers: Under international law, secession is rarely recognized without central government consent. Puntland would face an uphill battle for recognition, akin to Somaliland’s unresolved status.
  • Security Risks: Mogadishu could retaliate militarily, exacerbating conflict. Al-Shabab might exploit the chaos to expand territory.
  • Economic Implications: Loss of access to Somali financial systems and World Bank/IMF aid (via Mogadishu) could cripple Puntland’s economy unless alternative partnerships are secured.

Steps Forward:

  • Preparatory Measures: Strengthen governance institutions, diversify revenue (e.g., port fees, diaspora bonds), and seek bilateral aid (e.g., UAE, Ethiopia).
  • Regional Diplomacy: Court neighbors for recognition, framing independence as a stabilization measure. Leverage Puntland’s anti-extremism role.
  • Gradual Unilateralism: Incrementally assert sovereignty (e.g., issuing visas, signing trade deals) while avoiding overt provocation until international backing is assured.

Recommendations

  1. Prioritize Dialogue: Exhaust all avenues for constitutional reform and confederation before considering independence. A united front with other federal states increases leverage.
  2. Engage International Mediators: Involve IGAD, the AU, potentially Mogadishu allies like Qatar/Turkey (key Somalia donors) to pressure Mogadishu into negotiations.
  3. Contingency Planning: Prepare for independence discreetly (e.g., building foreign alliances, securing revenue streams) while publicly advocating for reform.
  4. Address Security Collaboratively: Propose a federal-state security pact with AU support (AUSSOM) to counter extremists, showcasing Puntland’s commitment to Somali stability.

Ultimately, Puntland’s path must balance pragmatic diplomacy with firm advocacy for autonomy. While independence remains a last resort, incremental steps toward confederalism or constitutional overhaul could preserve Somali unity while addressing governance grievances.