In a sane moral universe, this question would not even exist. Hatred is hatred. Bigotry is bigotry. Dehumanization—whether aimed at Jews, Christians, Muslims, atheists, or anyone else—rots societies from the inside out. Yet we do not live in a sane moral universe. We live in an age where words are not merely descriptive; they are weapons. And nowhere is this more visible than in the increasingly cynical deployment of the term antisemitism, and the conspicuous silence around its mirror image: goyism.
Let us be clear from the outset: antisemitism is real, historically catastrophic, and morally indefensible. It produced pogroms, ghettos, expulsions, and the Holocaust—the darkest industrialized crime in human history. Any attempt to trivialize or deny that legacy is obscene. Jews, like all peoples, have the absolute right to safety, dignity, and freedom from persecution.
But acknowledging that truth does not require surrendering reason. Nor does it justify the intellectual fraud now underway in many political and media circles.
From Shield to Sword: The Mutation of “Antisemitism”
Today, antisemitism has been stretched far beyond its original meaning. It is no longer confined to hatred of Jews as Jews. Instead, it is increasingly invoked to describe:
criticism of the Israeli government,
opposition to Zionist ideology,
protest against occupation, siege, or collective punishment,
or even appeals to international law and human rights.
In this distorted framework, a Jewish anti-Zionist can be labeled antisemitic, while a non-Jewish supporter of ethnic supremacy is applauded as a “friend of Israel.” This is not moral clarity. It is semantic coercion.
When a word that once named a real and deadly hatred is inflated to silence debate, it loses precision—and eventually credibility. That is not a victory against antisemitism; it is a gift to it.
The Taboo Twin: What Is Goyism?
Now enter the term no one wants to touch.
Goyism—the belief in Jewish exceptionalism taken to the point of contempt for non-Jews—is not a myth invented by antisemites. It is a documented attitude present in some religious, political, and ideological currents, just as supremacist thinking exists in all communities when power goes unchecked.
Goyism manifests when:
non-Jewish lives are treated as expendable,
international law is dismissed because “it doesn’t apply to us,”
mass civilian suffering is justified by ethnic or theological hierarchy,
critics are dehumanized as morally inferior simply for not belonging to the “chosen” group.
To name this phenomenon is not antisemitism. It is anti-supremacism. The refusal to acknowledge its existence, however, is intellectual dishonesty.
Which Is Worse?
The question itself is flawed.
Asking “which is worse” is like asking whether racism or sectarianism is more poisonous. Both kill. Both corrode. Both rely on the same logic: some lives matter more than others.
Antisemitism targets Jews.
Goyism targets non-Jews.
Both deny equal human worth. Both are morally bankrupt.
The real danger lies not in naming either, but in ranking suffering, monopolizing victimhood, and criminalizing criticism.
The WAPMEN Position: No Sacred Hatreds
Warsame Digital Media rejects all ethnic, religious, and civilizational supremacism—without exception and without fear.
Hatred of Jews is wrong. Period.
Hatred of non-Jews is wrong. Period.
Exploiting historical trauma to justify present-day injustice is wrong.
Turning moral language into a bludgeon against dissent is wrong.
There are no holy bigotries.
There are no protected supremacies.
There are no untouchable ideologies.
If antisemitism must be confronted honestly, then so must goyism. If Jewish lives matter—as they absolutely do—then all lives must matter equally, not rhetorically, but in practice.
Anything less is not justice.
It is tribalism dressed up as morality.
And history has already shown us where that road leads.
Warsame Policy & Media Network (WAPMEN) 