Reviewed Article:

Addis Standard (13 October 2025): “The Northeastern State of Somalia: A Gateway to Enhance the Federal Model or a Step to Exacerbate Existing Tensions?”

1. Overview and Framing Bias

Although the article presents itself as a neutral academic analysis, its structure and tone betray a centralist-leaning framework aligned with Mogadishu’s narrative. The “Key Takeaways” and early paragraphs frame the new state as a federal success story—an “aspiration of marginalized communities”—while the rest of the essay acknowledges the backlash from Puntland and Somaliland almost as afterthoughts.
The authorship (“EPC Horn of African Studies Unit”) and repeated emphasis on Mogadishu’s legitimacy and “federal balance of power” suggest a think-tank piece designed to intellectualize Villa Somalia’s political maneuver rather than neutrally assess it.

2. Content Strengths

a. Structured Political Mapping:
The article successfully sequences the political logic behind Mogadishu’s move:

Weakening Somaliland’s secessionism

Curtailing Puntland’s autonomy

Projecting federal power through Laascaanood

Signaling to foreign partners that Mogadishu can redraw Somalia’s internal map

b. Recognition of Regional Complexity:
It fairly acknowledges that Sanaag and Ayn remain deeply divided, and that Khatumo’s legitimacy is fragmented along clan lines, especially with the Warsangeli’s hesitation. This is a rare admission from a Mogadishu-leaning publication.

c. Connection to Foreign Policy:
It perceptively links Mogadishu’s political urgency to shifting international attitudes toward Somaliland—particularly Washington’s signals suggesting possible reconsideration of the “One Somalia” doctrine. That link between domestic maneuvering and foreign perception is a genuine analytical strength.

3. Analytical Weaknesses

a. Intellectualized Centralism:
The essay treats centralization through new states as institution-building, when in fact it is state capture through fragmentation. It normalizes federal interference by redefining clan insurgencies as “federal initiatives.”

b. Mischaracterization of Puntland’s Stance:
Puntland’s constitutional objections are reduced to mere “territorial concerns.” It ignores Article 49 of Somalia’s Provisional Constitution, which requires bottom-up consent for creating new federal states. This omission hides the illegality of the “sixth state.”

c. Silence on SSC-Khatumo’s Autonomy Narrative:
The analysis erases the fact that SSC-Khatumo’s uprising was anti-Somaliland but not pro-Mogadishu. By merging it into a centralist storyline, the article co-opts a local liberation movement’s agency.

d. Overreliance on External Sources:
Citing Reddit for maps and multiple media links without quoting Somali academics or SSC officials exposes the essay as desktop analysis, not field research, and weakens its scholarly credibility.

4. Political Messaging and Subtext

The article’s subtext targets multiple audiences:

Donors: Somalia is “federalizing effectively,” so aid should flow through Mogadishu.

Somaliland: Any talk of independence will meet administrative counter-weight.

Puntland: “Your dominance is over; Mogadishu can manufacture federal states.”

SSC-Khatumo elites: “Align with us, and we’ll legitimize you.”

In essence, this is propaganda disguised as policy analysis—a textbook case of narrative laundering through international media.

5. Regional Geopolitical Implications

a. Ethiopia’s Shadow:
The omission of Ethiopia’s interest in the Laascaanood corridor is glaring. Addis Ababa’s security calculus via Borana and Somali regions overlaps directly with Mogadishu’s activism in the northeast.

b. UAE and Gulf Footprint:
The essay overlooks how the UAE’s port politics in Bossaso and Berbera parallel the federal re-engineering underway in Khatumo.

c. Puntland–Somaliland Convergence:
While it briefly mentions possible reconciliation between Garowe and Hargeisa, it understates its transformative potential. Villa Somalia’s provocation may, in fact, accelerate a confederal realignment—a joint front of Puntland and Somaliland against central overreach.

6. Internal Contradictions

The essay calls Khatumo “Somalia’s sixth federal state” while admitting it “lacks inclusivity, cohesion, and control.” That is a contradiction in terms—a state without statehood.

It praises Mogadishu for “integrating regions,” yet concedes that the move “deepens polarization.”

It attributes Khatumo’s creation to local “aspirations,” but all evidence shows top-down orchestration from Mogadishu.

7. WDM Interpretation: What the Article Doesn’t Say

From a Warsame Digital Media (WDM) analytical perspective:

1. Khatumo’s invention is not a gateway to federal renewal but a Trojan horse to dilute Puntland and suffocate Somaliland’s diplomacy.

2. Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Damul Jadiid strategy seeks to encircle Puntland with loyal satellites—Galmudug in the south, Khatumo in the north—to weaken Garowe before 2026 elections.

3. SSC-Khatumo elites risk losing grassroots legitimacy the moment they are absorbed by Villa Somalia’s orbit.

4. The international community should interpret this as re-centralization through clan engineering—a process that historically precedes civil conflict in Somalia.

8. Conclusion: A Manufactured “Federal State”

The Addis Standard Op-Ed is a polished justification of Mogadishu’s interference dressed in think-tank prose. It records events accurately but interprets them through a centralist optic—minimizing constitutional breaches, exaggerating community consent, and masking the geopolitical game behind “federal consolidation.”

In truth, the so-called Northeastern State of Somalia (Khatumo) is less a bottom-up federal success than a top-down political instrument.
It will neither enhance Somalia’s federal model nor stabilize the Horn; it will exacerbate tensions among Puntland, Somaliland, and SSC-Khatumo—each now trapped in competing legitimacy claims.

WDM Evaluation Summary

WDM Analytical Ratings (1–10 scale):

Factual depth: 8 — Well-sourced chronology

Analytical balance: 5 — Strong Mogadishu bias

Constitutional awareness: 3 — Ignores Article 49 framework

Regional insight: 6 — Misses Ethiopian/Gulf dimensions

Propaganda sophistication: 9 — Subtle centralist spin masked as scholarship

Final Assessment

On the WDM Reality Index, this Op-Ed scores 6.2/10 — intellectually polished but politically misleading.
It reflects Mogadishu’s growing use of external media to legitimize unconstitutional experiments in federal manipulation.
For scholars and policy observers, it stands as a case study in how fragile federal systems can be rewritten through narrative, not law.

By Ismail H. Warsame — Warsame Digital Media (WDM Historical Essay, 2025)

Abstract

This essay posits that the modern Puntland State of Somalia is the direct geographical and cultural heir to the ancient Egyptian Ta Netjer—the fabled “Land of the Gods,” known as Punt. By synthesizing archaeological records, textual evidence, and contemporary ecological data, this study traces an unbroken thread of aromatic-resin production from the Pharaonic era to the present day. It concludes that Puntland’s resource base is not merely an economic asset but a living testament to its role in one of history’s earliest and most prestigious global trade networks.

1. A Legacy Carved in Stone and Landscape

Ancient Egyptian inscriptions vividly portray Punt as a distant southern coast, a land of aromatic trees, ivory, and exotic animals (Breasted 1906, 231). The famed reliefs from Pharaoh Hatshepsut’s temple at Deir el-Bahari provide a visual map: they depict stilted huts, lush coastal vegetation, and distinctive mountain ridges that strikingly mirror the Golis Range and Bari coastal plains of modern Puntland. This correlation strongly suggests that the northern Somali coastline—from Bosaso to Qandala and the ancient port of Hafun—formed the core of the legendary Punt (Kitchen 1993, 27; Manzo 2017, 180).

2. The Incense Belt: An Unbroken Ecological Heritage

The heart of Punt’s wealth was its flora. The unique botanical zone of Commiphora myrrha (myrrh) and Boswellia carteri (frankincense) runs almost exclusively through Puntland’s Golis and Cal Miskaad mountains. Significantly, Egyptian cargo lists from Hatshepsut’s expedition describe the transport of “myrrh trees with their roots,” a detail that aligns perfectly with the biological range of these species (Naville 1898, pl. LXVII).

This connection is not merely historical. Modern scientific analyses, including DNA and isotopic testing of resins, confirm that the highest-quality myrrh in today’s global perfume and pharmaceutical markets still originates from the Bari and Sanaag regions (Dominy et al. 2020; Fattovich 2012, 207). Puntland, therefore, is not just a historical site but a living archive of the Puntite environment, its hills continuing to produce the same precious resins after four millennia.

3. From Ancient Ritual to Modern Markets: The Resin Economy

The aromatic wealth of Puntland extends beyond frankincense and myrrh. Local communities also harvest natural chewing gums derived from Acacia species, exported as gum arabic and gum myrrh. These are the very same plant exudates that the ancient Egyptians prized for embalming and temple rituals (Redford 2003, 168), creating a direct link between ancient sacred practices and modern global industries like confectionery, cosmetics, and medicine.

Field surveys by the FAO and local cooperatives indicate that Puntland’s annual potential for exporting frankincense and natural gums exceeds 10,000 metric tons, representing a multi-million-dollar renewable economy (FAO 2021). However, this potential remains underdeveloped, with harvesting methods often artisanal and environmentally unsustainable, threatening the very resource that has defined the region for centuries.

4. Reclaiming an Identity: The Meaning of “Puntland”

The official adoption of the name “Puntland” in 1998 was a profound act of cultural and historical reclamation. It was a conscious effort by the region’s founders to anchor a modern political identity in a deep, pre-existing civilizational heritage. This naming symbolizes a declaration that Somali state-building can draw strength from its own historical authenticity. The ancient title “Land of the Gods” thus evolves into a powerful metaphor for self-reliance, maritime heritage, and ecological stewardship in the modern era.

5. From Historical Successor to Economic Leader

Recognizing Puntland as the successor to Punt reframes its economic potential. This is not a subsistence economy, but a heritage-based one. Strategic policies that protect resin-producing trees, regulate sustainable harvesting, and promote branded products like “Puntland Myrrh” or “Puntland Natural Gum” can transform an ancient trade into a premium modern industry.

Furthermore, Puntland’s strategic ports—Bosaso and the historic Qandala—occupy the same locations where Egyptian and Greco-Roman ships once anchored to load their precious cargo. By reactivating these maritime routes through legal, eco-certified trade, Puntland can reclaim its ancient stature as a commercial hub within the modern Red Sea economy.

6. Conclusion

The same sun-baked escarpments that once perfumed the temples of the pharaohs today sustain the livelihoods of Somali harvesters. From the myrrh trees depicted in Hatshepsut’s reliefs to the bustling resin markets of modern Bosaso, the continuity is undeniable. The “Land of the Gods” endures—not as a forgotten myth, but in the tangible, fragrant tears of gum and incense that continue to flow from Puntland’s trees, connecting a legendary past to a promising future.

—

Bibliography

Bard, Kathryn A., and Rodolfo Fattovich. Harbor of the Pharaohs to the Land of Punt: Archaeological Investigations at Mersa/Wadi Gawasis, Egypt (2001–2009). Naples: Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale,” 2010.

Breasted, James H. Ancient Records of Egypt. Vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1906.

Dominy, Nathaniel J., et al. “Mummified Baboons Reveal the Far-Reaching Trade of Ancient Egypt.” eLife 9 (2020): e57523.

FAO. Non-Wood Forest Products of Somalia: Frankincense, Myrrh and Natural Gums. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization, 2021.

Fattovich, Rodolfo A. “The Red Sea and the Horn of Africa in the Ancient World.” African Archaeological Review 29, no. 2 (2012): 199–212.

Kitchen, Kenneth A. The Land of Punt. London: University College London Press, 1993.

Manzo, Andrea. “Eastern Africa and the Horn in the Middle Kingdom and New Kingdom: A View from Egypt.” African Archaeological Review 34, no. 2 (2017): 173–195.

Naville, Edouard. The Temple of Deir el-Bahari: The Expedition to Punt. London: Egypt Exploration Fund, 1898.

Redford, Donald B. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.