© 2025 WDM | By Ismail H. Warsame

For decades, mass deportation was a silent policy in the shadows of the Gulf—a brutal tool for managing migrant labor. Now, it has been imported, polished, and implemented with chilling efficiency by its former critics in the West.

The Great Reversal

Where glass palaces of moral authority once stood, deportation centers now rise. Western capitals that long lectured the world on human rights are perfecting a new craft: the industrial-scale expulsion of asylum seekers, often back to the very conflicts and crises they fled. The irony is historic. As Riyadh and Abu Dhabi modernize their labor laws, Washington, London, and Paris are adopting the zeal—if not the exact methods—of the Gulf’s immigration police of a bygone era.

This is more than a policy shift; it is a fundamental reversal of the West’s civilizational narrative. The nations that authored the doctrine of universal human rights are now revealing its fine print: those rights are conditional, reserved primarily for the right kind of people.

From Citizenship to Conditional Residency

The logical next step is already materializing: the redefinition of citizenship itself. Under the banners of “security” and “social cohesion,” the inviolable guarantees of passports and birthrights are being quietly rewritten. The unstated goal is a last stand against demographic change—an effort to preserve a certain image of nationhood that looks less like a diverse modern state and more like a nostalgic advertisement.

The hypocrisy is staggering. The same Western think tanks that for years advised Gulf monarchies on “integrating” their migrant populations are now watching as their governments test mass deportation as a legitimate tool of domestic policy. If hypocrisy were an Olympic sport, the medals would be awarded in gold, silver, and bronze to its founding proponents.

The Collapse of a Global Order

The long-term consequences are yet to be seen. Can the international human rights framework, already on life support, survive this betrayal by its architects? Or are we witnessing the birth of a new, grim global standard: “Rights for us, walls for you”?

The message for now is unequivocal. The West has become what it once claimed to resist. The moral high ground has been sold, its proceeds funding a sprawling network of detention camps and deportation flights. The world is watching the teacher become the student, and the lesson is one in realpolitik, devoid of principle.

Villa Somalia’s Shadow War on Puntland

By Ismail H. Warsame | © 2025 WDM

---

Introduction: The New Battleground

In today’s Somalia, war is no longer fought only with militias and mortars — it is fought with money, memes, and manipulated narratives. The real front line is digital. And if our investigation is correct, Villa Somalia under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud has quietly opened a new campaign — one that targets Puntland State not with tanks, but with federal cash, proxy agents, and internet propaganda designed to fragment its autonomy and capture its political future.

This is not federalism. This is a hostile takeover.

---

I. The Funding Trail: Following Mogadishu’s Money

In the shadow corridors of Villa Somalia, untraceable “emergency funds” are reportedly diverted from donor-financed budgets and security allocations. These funds don’t go to rebuilding roads or schools — they allegedly bankroll proxy influence networks.

The Alleged Pipeline:

1. Federal Treasury → “Special Projects” Fund
2. NGO & Civil Society Fronts → Grants & Consultancies
3. Local Elders, Influencers, Media Owners → Social Media Campaigns

But here is the most explosive allegation: internationally donated development funds intended for Puntland’s infrastructure projects are being deliberately frozen by Mogadishu.

Road-building funds, health program disbursements, and even teacher salary support packages are said to be held back — not because Puntland failed compliance, but because Villa Somalia uses the money as leverage:

“Cooperate with Mogadishu, or watch your roads crumble.”

This is economic warfare by bureaucratic chokehold. Puntland’s citizens suffer stalled projects while Mogadishu’s loyalists boast about “holding Garowe accountable.”

When Puntland clashed with Mogadishu over E-Visa fees, the propaganda machines went into overdrive: Facebook pages accusing Puntland of “secessionism,” TikTok videos portraying Garowe as “anti-federal,” and WhatsApp rumors about imminent “federal sanctions.”

---

II. The Digital Troll Army

Enter Anti-Puntland elements, the networks long accused of running psychological operations. Today, they have gone fully online. Thousands of burner accounts, Telegram channels, and paid TikTok activists flood the discourse with carefully crafted messages:

SaveSSCFromPuntland Hashtag trends just as Laascaanood erupts.

FederalismNotClanism is amplified another hashtag whenever Puntland asserts its constitutional rights.

Deni’s photo is memed into a villain whenever he resists Villa Somalia’s agenda.

This isn’t random noise — this is coordinated information warfare. It is designed to make Puntland youth question their own government’s legitimacy and to reframe Mogadishu as the only source of order.

---

III. Laascaanood: The Prototype Operation

The Laascaanood crisis was not just a territorial war — it was a political laboratory.

Puntland fought, bled, and spent heavily to liberate SSC from Somaliland. Then, as soon as the dust settled, Villa Somalia swooped in with “peace conferences” and “reconciliation forums.” Within months, SSC had its own “Federal-recognized administration,” effectively cutting Puntland out of the equation.

The message was unmistakable: Puntland could fight, but Mogadishu would rule.

---

IV. The Political Endgame: Building a Puppet State

The long-term objective, as this WDM investigation frames it, is chillingly clear:

1. Create a Parallel “North-East State”: Recognized by Mogadishu but not Garowe.
2. Split Puntland’s Federal Representation: Send loyalists to Mogadishu who will vote with Villa Somalia.
3. Negotiate Directly: Secure oil deals, security compacts, and donor funds bypassing Puntland’s government entirely.

If successful, Puntland becomes a geographic region with no political teeth — a federal unit in name only.

---

V. The Fallout: A Federation in Name Only

If Villa Somalia continues down this path, Somalia is not heading toward a stronger federation — it is heading toward a Mogadishu-centered unitary state disguised as federalism. That is a recipe for more rebellion, not stability.

Somali politics thrives on negotiated coexistence, not digital colonization. Turning federal money into propaganda weapons — and freezing internationally donated development funds — will deepen mistrust and accelerate the cycle of fragmentation.

---

Editorial Verdict: Somalia’s Digital Empire

If even half of these allegations hold water, Villa Somalia has traded nation-building for Banadir fiefdom. It is governing with hashtags instead of consensus, bots instead of ballots, and propaganda instead of partnership.

Somalia cannot survive another round of centralizing authoritarianism. The future of federalism depends on restraint, dialogue, and respect for the autonomy of member states — not on secret budgets, internet troll armies, and psychological warfare campaigns.

---

WDM Calls to Action

Transparency: Donor funds must be ring-fenced and delivered to Puntland without political manipulation.

Digital Ethics: Somalia’s political actors must agree to a code of conduct against bot-driven campaigns and paid disinformation.

Constitutional Discipline: Federalism must mean partnership, not dominance.

Executive Summary

Puntland’s stability, autonomy, and relative success have made it a prime target in Somali politics. What Mogadishu could not achieve through direct confrontation, it is now pursuing through a calculated campaign to discredit Puntland’s institutions and leadership.

This campaign is not random criticism—it is organized reputational warfare. Academics provide intellectual cover, framing Puntland’s actions as violations of international norms. Influencers turn minor setbacks and tragic incidents into viral scandals. Political networks amplify these narratives until they dominate public discourse. And at the top, Villa Somalia and its Aaran Jaan operators act as strategic beneficiaries, using the resulting chaos to weaken Garowe’s negotiating power within the federal system.

The result is a deliberate erosion of Puntland’s credibility—turning security operations, judicial decisions, and local disputes into tools for delegitimization. This is no longer just politics; it is a sustained effort to fragment Puntland’s influence and force it into a weaker, more manageable position.

For Puntland, the new front line is not only in the mountains or parliament but in the information space. Narrative warfare is now the main battlefield—and losing it could mean losing much more than reputation.

The Players Behind the Campaign

1. The Legitimacy Provider – Professor Abdiwahaab & Associates
Abdiwahaab and likeminded academics supply the intellectual cover for this effort. Their papers and opinion columns provide “evidence” for claims that Puntland’s governance is failing or abusive. This is not neutral scholarship—it is political narrative building. When ordinary criticism fails to resonate, their analysis escalates into sweeping geopolitical claims, portraying Puntland as a client of foreign powers or an actor outside legitimate Somali politics.

This academic packaging gives smear campaigns an air of credibility and helps mobilize diaspora outrage under the guise of principled activism.

2. The Digital Enforcers – Hussein Jama’s Media Wing
Hussein Jama and similar online influencers serve as the amplification arm. Their goal is not to inform but to inflame. Minor bureaucratic failures are turned into national scandals; tragic but complicated incidents are framed as state-sanctioned atrocities. Their work is optimized for maximum outrage and viral spread—not for nuance, accuracy, or solutions.

This digital warfare targets Puntland’s social cohesion, exploiting fault lines such as SSC-Khaatumo and weaponizing grief from real tragedies to undermine trust in Garowe’s leadership.

3. The Political Vehicle – Damul Jadid Networks
Damul Jadid operates as the political distributor of the narrative. Its loose networks “curate” stories, circulate claims through social media and political forums, and give the appearance of broad consensus. When challenged, they can deny coordination, claiming to be independent voices merely “raising concerns.”

Their true function is to ensure every story damaging Puntland gains visibility and traction.

4. The Strategic Beneficiary – Villa Somalia and Aaran Jaan
At the top sits Villa Somalia, under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, with Aaran Jaan serving as the operational hub. The first-term approach—direct confrontation with Puntland—failed. The new approach is indirect: deploy federal resources, sympathetic intellectuals, online activists, and diaspora networks to gradually weaken Puntland’s credibility and bargaining position.

This is not a random smear campaign. It is a deliberate strategy to fragment Puntland’s influence and create a political environment where Garowe can be bypassed or subdued in national decision-making.

The Methods: A Playbook of Reputational Warfare

Isolate and Extrapolate: Turn one official’s misconduct into evidence of systemic rot.

Bury Achievements, Amplify Failures: Successes disappear into footnotes, failures dominate headlines and hashtags.

Emotional Weaponization: Complex issues like counter-terrorism justice are reduced to slogans—“They execute children”—designed to provoke outrage.

Targeted Narrative Delivery: Content is micro-targeted to specific clans, diaspora communities, and political blocs to ensure maximum polarization.

Case Study: Judicial Warfare

When Puntland’s military courts tried insurgents accused of atrocities—some as minors—the legal and moral complexity was stripped away.

Academics produced papers denouncing “violations of international norms.”

Influencers paired these quotes with dramatic video clips and grieving families.

Diaspora networks translated and circulated the content until it dominated discussion.

Federal officials then demanded “greater oversight” of Puntland courts, framing Garowe as reckless and unaccountable.

The result: Puntland’s security institutions were weakened in perception, precisely when they were most active against insurgents.

Case Study: Exploiting SSC-Khaatumo

The assassination of a Warsengeli elder in Sanaag became a propaganda gift.

Narrative framing painted Puntland as the aggressor, erasing the complexity of the conflict.

Media packages turned tragedy into proof of Garowe’s alleged “expansionism.”

Targeted dissemination ensured the most incendiary messaging reached the most affected communities.

Instead of fostering reconciliation, the campaign inflamed divisions—keeping Puntland politically preoccupied and unable to consolidate gains.

Conclusion: A Calculated Campaign, Not a Conspiracy

This is not the work of a lone agitator. It is a coordinated ecosystem of academics, influencers, political networks, and federal operators pursuing a single strategic goal: erode Puntland’s standing until it can no longer act as a counterweight to central authority.

What is happening to Puntland is not constructive criticism, and it is not a debate about governance. It is a reputational war—outsourced, deniable, and relentless.

For Puntland, the challenge is no longer just military or financial. It is a narrative. The state must defend not only its borders, but its story. Because in this new battlespace, perception is power—and right now, that power is being systematically stripped away.