Courtesy

Somalia Between CIA and KGB: A Legacy of Intervention and the Struggle for Sovereignty

Abstract This paper examines Somalia’s modern history through the lens of foreign intervention and its corrosive impact on sovereignty. It traces the trajectory from colonial partition and Cold War proxy politics to the era of conditional aid and counter-terrorism partnerships. The argument advanced is that Somalia’s instability is not an inherent condition but a legacy of external manipulation and the failure of successive Somali leadership to construct resilient, accountable institutions. The conclusion posits that a patriotic and realistic foreign policy—anchored in economic sovereignty, technology transfer, and mature diplomacy—is the only path toward ending dependency and realizing the nation’s latent potential.  

1. Introduction: The Geopolitical Crucible

Somalia is a state born out of external design. Its borders, carved by European colonial powers, disregarded ethnic and cultural unity and imposed fragmentation. This fragmentation embedded permanent insecurity and made Somalia a prime target for Cold War competition. In the decades following independence, Somalia oscillated between Soviet and Western patronage, experiencing military rule, state collapse, and externally driven interventions under humanitarian or counter-terrorism labels. This paper argues that a realistic understanding of Somalia’s historical trajectory is essential for building sovereign policy anchored in economic development, accountability, and diversified partnerships.  

2. Colonial Division and the Cold War Trap (1960s–1980s)

2.1 The Colonial Legacy and Independent Non-Alignment

Somalia emerged from colonialism divided among British, Italian, and French administrators. Independence in 1960 gave rise to a Republic whose borders excluded Somali-inhabited regions in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Djibouti. The early government under President Abdirashid Ali Sharmarke experimented with non-alignment, cautiously maintaining ties with both Cold War blocs while leaning toward the West in style but engaging the Soviet Union for military assistance.

2.2 The Soviet Embrace and Military Rule

The USSR invested heavily in Somalia’s military establishment, training officers, embedding advisers, and supplying advanced equipment. By the mid-1970s, over 1,400 Soviet military advisers were present, and thousands of Somali officers were trained in Moscow. This Soviet-backed military elite facilitated the 1969 coup, installing Siad Barre and orienting Somalia toward Marxism-Leninism. Italy, by contrast, pursued institution-building, focusing on police and judicial structures.

2.3 The Ogaden Betrayal and Western Realignment

In 1977, Somalia invaded Ethiopia’s Ogaden region. The USSR abandoned Somalia in favor of Ethiopia, supporting Addis Ababa with Cuban troops and material aid. Somalia’s defeat exposed the risks of overreliance on a single patron. Barre expelled Soviet advisers and turned to Western and Arab allies, yet the authoritarian structure remained. The United States, eager to counter Soviet influence, tolerated Barre’s governance failures, reinforcing corruption and a lack of accountability.  

3. State Collapse and the Era of Chaos (1991–2000s)

The fall of Barre in 1991 left a vacuum that foreign and regional actors quickly exploited.

• UNOSOM II and the Mogadishu Crisis (1993): The U.S.-UN humanitarian mission devolved into direct combat with Somali factions. The October 1993 “Black Hawk Down” battle, resulting in 18 U.S. soldier deaths and hundreds of Somali casualties, prompted a full American withdrawal. Somalia was branded a “failed state,” and Washington retreated to containment strategies: limited intelligence operations, occasional strikes, and minimal aid.
• Proxy Warfare: Neighboring and Gulf states armed rival Somali factions, worsening fragmentation. Foreign manipulation perpetuated civil war and obstructed reconciliation.

4. The New Frontier: Counter-Terrorism and Conditional Aid

The rise of the Islamic Courts Union and Al-Shabaab reframed Somalia’s conflict through the counter-terrorism paradigm.

• Terrorist Creation and Empowerment: Indiscriminate strikes and interventions fueled radicalization, expanding militant recruitment.
• The Conditional Aid Trap: Billions in aid were securitized, tied to military purchases and donor agendas. Aid dependence entrenched, enriching foreign contractors rather than empowering Somali citizens.

5. A Patriotic Path Forward: Realism, Sovereignty, and Development

Somalia’s contemporary partnerships, particularly with Turkey and Qatar, suggest new models linking security cooperation with infrastructure, education, and health investment. For a sustainable future, Somalia requires a patriotic and realistic foreign policy based on:

1. Sovereign Accountability: Leadership must answer to citizens, not foreign donors. Ending corruption is central to public trust.
2. Economic Diplomacy: Somalia possesses vast underutilized resources:
   • 1 million hectares of arable land capable of achieving food sovereignty.
   • Africa’s largest livestock population with potential for export-led growth.
   • A 3,333 km coastline rich in fishing and blue economy prospects.
   • Suspected mineral and hydrocarbon reserves requiring transparent management.
3. Technology Transfer, Not Just Aid: Foreign partnerships must prioritize training, university cooperation, and industrial capacity-building.
4. Balanced, Mature Foreign Relations: Somalia should diversify partners, avoiding dependence on any single bloc, while cultivating a professional diplomatic corps capable of navigating multipolar realities.

6. Conclusion

Somalia’s instability is the product of colonial partition, Cold War proxy politics, authoritarianism, and externally imposed interventions. Neither Soviet militarization nor American containment fostered sovereignty. Italy’s institution-building efforts, though more modest, were overshadowed by superpower rivalry. Post–Cold War interventions deepened chaos, while counter-terrorism frameworks reduced Somalia to a security problem rather than a sovereign partner. The path forward lies not in another foreign roadmap but in an internal awakening: institution-building, resource-based development, and a mature foreign policy. Somalia must leverage its human and natural capital, pursuing partnerships grounded in equality, technology transfer, and economic growth. By addressing root causes—poverty, inequality, and weak governance—Somalia can achieve stability and independence, standing as a sovereign actor in a multipolar world.  

References

Britannica. (n.d.). Black Hawk Down. In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Soviet-Somali relations in the 1970s. Country Studies. (n.d.). Somalia: A country study. Library of Congress. Office of the Historian. (n.d.). U.S. relations with Somalia: Cold War era. U.S. Department of State. Scribd. (n.d.). Somalia and the Ogaden War. The Guardian. (2013). Black Hawk Down: The lasting legacy of America’s ill-fated mission in Somalia. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com Wikipedia. (n.d.). Ogaden War. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org Brelience Research http://www.brcsom.com 2025.

[Courtesy: Copyright ©️ Brilliance Research and Consulting].

By Ismail H. Warsame

A New Cast, Same Director

Laascaanood’s political theatre has changed its actors, but the director in Villa Somalia remains the same. President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s latest move is not nation-building—it is a hostile corporate takeover of SSC-Khatumo’s hard-earned autonomy. His endgame is clear: dismantle Puntland, the last effective check on his centralizing project, and replace it with a compliant “North East Entity,” a Mogadishu-loyal clone of Hirshabeele and GalMudugh.

The rhetoric of “liberation” is nothing but a hollow marketing slogan. The true mission is to install Chairman Abdikadir Aw Ali (Firdhiye) as Mogadishu’s proxy governor, rush his handpicked delegates to the federal parliament, and redraw Somalia’s political map with SSC’s blood as the ink for Puntland’s obituary.

Dueling Delegations: The Constitutional Bomb

Garowe will not sign its own death warrant. Puntland will appoint its own parliamentary delegation from SSC territories—territories it has legally represented for over two decades. The result: two rival delegations claiming the same seats, two competing mandates, one federal parliament thrown into chaos.

This is no mere “political impasse.” It is a constitutional detonation. Somalia’s Provisional Constitution contains no mechanism for resolving parallel representation. The fallout will shred what little legitimacy remains in the federal system, paralyze Mogadishu’s governance, and expose the entire state-building process as a façade.

The West’s Broken Playbook

Cue the well-worn script: foreign diplomats descending with tired calls for “dialogue” and “reconciliation.” But this is no misunderstanding. It is a calculated act of political aggression. Mediation under these circumstances will not resolve the conflict—it will entrench it, forcing Puntland to negotiate the terms of its own dismemberment under the gaze of international chaperones.

SSC’s Pyrrhic Victory

For SSC, this is the bitterest twist of fate. They fought and died to free themselves from Hargeisa’s grip, only to find themselves turned into Mogadishu’s pawn in its cold war against Puntland. Chairman Firdhiye now risks becoming the administrator of SSC’s second occupation—this time under the velvet glove of Villa Somalia rather than the iron fist of Muse Bihi.

And when Puntland is weakened and no longer a threat? Mogadishu will discard SSC like yesterday’s news, leaving them politically stranded, weaker and more divided than before.

The Real Stakes

This is bigger than 2026 elections. This is about whether Somalia will remain a federation or slide back into a centralized dictatorship with decorative regions as window-dressing.

Break Puntland over SSC, and the federal experiment dies. The likely response from Garowe? Total withdrawal from the federal project—an exit that could trigger state collapse and usher in international trusteeship, a scenario no Somali patriot should wish for.

WDM VERDICT: A Declaration of Political War

Make no mistake: Hassan Sheikh Mohamud is not integrating SSC. He is annexing it. This is nothing less than a declaration of political war on Puntland and on federalism itself.

If the international community chooses to “mediate” this crisis, they become co-authors of Somalia’s undoing. The only principled path forward is to uphold the constitutional order and reject any parallel institutions designed to weaken Puntland’s mandate.

WDM WARNING:

The future of Somalia will not be decided at the ballot box but in this manufactured crisis. To endorse Villa Somalia’s fiction is to greenlight the collapse of the Somali state. The stakes could not be higher.

September 13, 2025 Issue: Urban Transport Crisis & Public Safety Emergency in Garowe, Puntland, Proposed By:Warsame Digital Media (WDM) – Policy Analysis Unit

1. Executive Summary

This brief addresses the critical public safety and urban management crisis in Garowe caused by the unregulated proliferation of auto-rickshaws (Bajaj). The current situation poses an immediate threat to citizen safety, hinders economic activity, and signifies a major failure in transport governance. The root causes are identified as: uncontrolled importation of vehicles, lack of regulatory enforcement, and absence of formal public transport alternatives. This brief recommends a five-point policy intervention strategy, beginning with an immediate moratorium on Bajaj imports, to restore order, safety, and sustainable urban mobility in Garowe.

2. Background and Problem Statement

Garowe, the administrative capital of Puntland, is experiencing an acute crisis driven by an oversaturation of Bajaj three-wheelers. The unchecked importation of these vehicles has led to:

· A Public Safety Emergency: A dramatic rise in traffic accidents, injuries, and fatalities involving untrained, uninsured, and often underage drivers.
· Severe Urban Congestion: Critical arteries and market roads are paralyzed, impeding commerce and emergency services.
· Social and Environmental Degradation: Excessive noise and air pollution diminish quality of life, while the exploitation of unemployed youth fosters social tension.
· Governmental Authority Erosion: The consistent lack of enforcement has normalized lawlessness and eroded public trust in institutions.

This is not merely a traffic issue but a multifaceted policy failure requiring urgent and coordinated intervention.

3. Key Findings and Analysis

· Root Cause 1: Unregulated Import: The continuous flow of new Bajaj imports is the primary driver of market oversaturation, making the problem exponentially worse.
· Root Cause 2: Regulatory Vacuum: The absence of licensing, insurance, and traffic enforcement has created a perilous “wild west” environment on the roads.
· Root Cause 3: Economic Desperation: High youth unemployment has created a cheap labor force for Bajaj operators, who prioritize small profit over public safety.
· Root Cause 4: Lack of Alternatives: Citizens are forced to use Bajajs due to the non-existence of a safe, reliable, and formal public transport system.

4. Policy Recommendations

We urge the Puntland Administration to adopt the following coordinated policy measures:

1. Impose a Moratorium on Bajaj Imports
   · Implementing Body: Ministry of Trade, Ministry of Finance
   · Key Objectives: Immediately halt the influx of new vehicles to stabilize the situation and allow for effective management of the existing fleet.
2. Implement a Mandatory Licensing & Registration Framework
   · Implementing Body: Ministry of Transport, Traffic Police
   · Key Objectives:
     · Mandate driver’s licenses (minimum age 18)
     · Register all commercial Bajajs
     · Require mandatory third-party insurance
     · Enforce regular vehicle safety inspections
3. Launch a Targeted Traffic Enforcement Campaign
   · Implementing Body: Garowe Traffic Police Department
   · Key Objectives: Rigorously enforce traffic laws, penalizing infractions like reckless driving, overloading, and operating without a license or insurance.
4. Establish a City-Wide Operating Permit Cap
   · Implementing Body: Garowe Municipal Council, Ministry of Public Works.
   · Key Objectives: Limit the total number of Bajajs allowed to operate commercially based on a study of the city’s carrying capacity. The import moratorium (Action 1) is a prerequisite for this.
5. Initiate a Feasibility Study for a Public Bus System
   · Implementing Body: Ministry of Public Works, Planning Ministry
   · Key Objectives: Commission a study to design a safe, regulated, and reliable public bus network to provide a long-term alternative and create formal employment.

5. Expected Outcomes and Benefits

· Enhanced Public Safety: A drastic reduction in accidents and fatalities through regulated drivers and insured vehicles.
· Improved Urban Mobility: Reduced congestion and more orderly traffic flow.
· Economic Formalization: Creation of a structured, accountable transport sector that contributes to the formal economy.
· Increased Government Revenue: Generation of income through licensing, registration, insurance, and permit fees.
· Restored Public Trust: Demonstrating effective governance and a commitment to citizen welfare.

6. Conclusion

The Bajaj crisis is a solvable policy challenge. Continued inaction will result in further loss of life, economic damage, and social disorder. The recommended actions are sequential and interdependent. An immediate moratorium on imports is the critical first step to preventing the problem from worsening, while the other measures work to bring the existing situation under control and provide a sustainable future for Garowe’s transport system. We urge the relevant authorities to act with urgency to implement this strategy.

———

Contact: Warsame Digital Media(WDM) Garowe, Puntland. ismailwarsame@gmail.com, +252 90 703 4081.