HOW TO RESOLVE POLITICAL FRICTION BETWEEN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF SOMALIA AND PUNTLAND STATE

Resolving the political friction between the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) and Puntland State requires addressing deep-seated grievances over power-sharing, resource allocation, and constitutional interpretation, while fostering trust and institutionalizing cooperative governance. Below is a structured approach informed by Somalia’s political dynamics, federalism challenges, and lessons from similar conflicts:

---

1. Address Core Grievances

• Constitutional Clarity:
  • Finalize and ratify Somalia’s provisional constitution to clarify federal-state powers, including:
    • Revenue Sharing: Establish transparent mechanisms for distributing resources (e.g., port revenues, fisheries, oil/gas).
    • Security Arrangements: Define roles for federal and state forces in combating terrorism (e.g., Al-Shabab, ISIS) and managing local militias.
  • Ensure Puntland’s concerns about overcentralization are addressed, balancing autonomy with national unity.
• Resource Management:
  • Create joint committees to oversee natural resource exploration and revenue-sharing agreements (e.g., Puntland’s oil blocks).
  • Adopt models like Nigeria’s derivation principle, where states retain a percentage of locally generated resources.

---

2. Institutionalize Dialogue Mechanisms

• National Reconciliation Framework:
  • Revive platforms like the National Consultative Council (NCC), ensuring Puntland’s equal participation alongside other federal member states.
  • Involve traditional elders (Guurti), civil society, and religious leaders to mediate disputes and legitimize agreements.
• Third-Party Mediation:
  • Engage neutral actors (e.g., IGAD, AU, or Qatar/Turkey as trusted partners) to broker talks and guarantee implementation of deals.

---

3. Build Trust Through Incremental Steps

• Confidence-Building Measures:
  • Jointly manage critical infrastructure (e.g., Bosaso Port) to demonstrate shared benefits.
  • Cooperate on security operations against Al-Shabab/ISIS in contested areas (e.g., Galgala mountains).
• Symbolic Gestures:
  • Publicly acknowledge Puntland’s historical role in stabilizing Somalia and its contributions to counterterrorism.
  • Avoid inflammatory rhetoric; instead, emphasize shared Somali identity in official communications.

---

4. Learn from Past Failures and Successes

• Avoid Past Mistakes:
  • The 2016 Mogadishu Declaration failed due to lack of implementation. Future agreements must include timelines, monitoring mechanisms, and penalties for non-compliance.
• Emulate Positive Models:
  • Borrow from Ethiopia’s ethnic federalism (though imperfect) to balance regional autonomy with federal oversight.
  • Study the Puntland-Somaliland dialogue (e.g., 2014 Tukaraq ceasefire) for lessons on conflict de-escalation.

---

5. Strengthen Federalism Through Equity

• Equitable Representation:
  • Ensure Puntland holds influential positions in federal institutions (e.g., Parliament, Cabinet, Supreme Court).
• Development Parity:
  • Direct international aid (e.g., World Bank, EU) to Puntland’s infrastructure and services to reduce perceptions of marginalization.

---

6. Mitigate External Interference

• Regional Actors:
  • Counteract divisive roles played by Gulf states (e.g., UAE vs. Qatar rivalries influencing Somali federalism).
• Donor Coordination:
  • Unify international partners (UN, U.S., EU) behind a coherent strategy supporting Somali-led solutions, not competing agendas.

---

7. Prepare for Political Transitions

• Electoral Reforms:
  • Ensure Puntland’s buy-in to Somalia’s electoral model (e.g., one-person-one-vote vs. clan-based systems) to prevent boycotts.
• Leadership Engagement:
  • Foster personal rapport between FGS and Puntland leaders (e.g., President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud and Puntland’s Said Abdullahi Deni).

---

Challenges and Risks

• Spoilers: Hardliners in Mogadishu or Garowe may sabotage deals to retain power.
• Resource Curse: Oil/gas discoveries could exacerbate tensions if not managed transparently.
• Security Vacuum: Stalemates risk ceding territory to ISIS/Al-Shabab, as seen in Galmudug and Bari regions.

---

Conclusion

The FGS-Puntland rift reflects broader struggles to reconcile Somali nationalism with federal autonomy. A sustainable solution requires constitutional finality, equitable resource governance, and inclusive dialogue backed by enforceable agreements. International partners should support Somali-owned processes without imposing external models. While compromise will be difficult, incremental progress—such as joint security operations or revenue-sharing pilots—can rebuild trust and demonstrate the benefits of cooperation over confrontation. Ultimately, Somalia’s stability depends on balancing the aspirations of its federal states with the imperative of a united, functional central government.