THE ELUSIVE REGIME OF DEMOCRACY

My understanding of democratization is that there is no better alternative to it. It is an arbitration of conflict between political opponents to avoid violence and harm in the society and to themselves and supporters. As far as corruption is concerned, this is where strong institutions and rule of law come in. Checks and balance could be elusive, if the public institutions are weak and the executive branch takes advantage.

There could be more, but I strongly believe that where there is no freedom of press and independent judiciary, there can be no democracy for only these two public institutions can reign in corruption and abuses of power.

Freedom of the press cannot thrive in any given country without people understanding and supporting it. You can’t have successful independent media among non-readers and mostly illiterate or semi-illiterate citizens. People with no culture of readership and curiosity can’t have democracy. You can’t also have an independent judiciary in a poor society where judges are hired with little or no pay.

You also need to teach civic education in schools. People should consume quality information and learn facts and history. You can’t do that without people developing the habit of readership.

Here, we don’t have to seek the ideal situation of good governance, but to start the process towards a long journey. You can’t do that without continuity-based governance and preserving historical records.

WDM ANNOUNCEMENT

Warsame Digital Media WDM will share articles with those readers, who show interest in the topics and issues we write about. The only way we can measure this show of interest is:

  1. By subscriptions
  2. By comments and interactions
  3. By contributions of information and articles.

We are encouraged by the above readers’ activities. For a number of years WDM has been sharing articles, essays and video clips to groups of internet networks and chat rooms, Meta groups as well as colleagues and individuals. This free sharing of WDM contributions to the development of a free society symbolized by free media as Warsame Digital Media WDM should operate sustainably with the support of our esteemed readers. We are, therefore, doing away passive readers and those, who show no interest in WDM Puntland and national news coverage and debate.

For those, who would like to join WDM, our contact info is

Tel/WhatsApp: +252 90 703 4081
Chief Editor’s email account: ismailwarsame@gmail.com
Annual Subscription Fee is US$37 only.

We thank for your generous support.

Send fee by PayPal at ismail.warsame@yahoo.ca or remit to the following accounts:
a) Sahal +252 90 703 4081
b) eDahab +252 66 679 4548
c) EVCPLUS +252 61 588 388. d) MyCash +252 71 681 4371

Chief Editor,
Garowe, Puntland, Somalia

TRIALS AND ERRORS IN PUNTLAND GOVERNANCE

A review of last night’s political debate called for by President Said Abdullahi for a chit-chat at Presidency ensued today between participants over a teatable conversation at a hotel lobby. Since some of us weren’t privy to the substance of the overnight’s debate, we were good listeners to those who wanted to compare notes among themselves and didn’t mind our presence at table. The issue was Puntland democratization and how to better manage traditional tribal mechanism. That event at Presidency is one of President Deni’s rarest occasions he was improvising lately, after many trials and errors in governing Puntland from the perspective of one man show, as other state institutions are weakened almost beyond repair.

Some of us, who casually had happened to be around at that hotel table, tried to contribute to the interesting discussion. We were looked at as outsiders since we weren’t privy to the last night’s prestigious auspice granted by the President to a selected group of Puntland VIPs not considered out of favor from the Presidency. Some of the participants in last night’s get-together with the President came from Somali Diaspora communities. Although they were in deep learning curve on Puntland governance and history of the young Federal Member State, they were eager to offer new ideas to the debate on Puntland socio-economic developments, we learned.

As our round hotel table discussion developed further, we came to debate on the notion of democratization of Puntland system of governance and how to manage the disadvantages of tribal system in the State and Somalia, in general. The issue is management of clans in a democratic society or a tribal society desirous of establishing a modern democratic society as in the case of Puntland. One of us asked the question: “In a country of laws, who is sovereign or supreme, traditional leadership or the rule of law by the state’s institutions?” This fundamental inquiry sparked off fierce debate at table. Although there was no common understanding reached here, the consensus was that successive Puntland administrations were to blame on the state of affairs of Puntland governance. Political leaders had failed Puntland, a situation that led to stagnation of the state in all sctors.

Analysis | Merrick Garland seeks to call Trump’s bluff

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/11/garland-trump-warrant-unseal/