Tag: #Puntland #Al-Shabab #ISIS #fight #Somalia

HOW TO HANDLE DECEASED TERRORISTS AT BATTLE FIELDS

Handling the bodies of deceased combatants, including terrorists, requires adherence to legal, ethical, health, and sociopolitical considerations. Below are best practices for managing the remains of ISIS fighters killed in conflict with Puntland State forces, informed by international standards and lessons from similar contexts:

1. Legal and Ethical Obligations

  • International Humanitarian Law (IHL): Even though ISIS is a non-state actor, customary IHL principles (e.g., humane treatment of the dead) should guide actions to uphold moral legitimacy and avoid accusations of war crimes.
  • Respect for Human Dignity: Avoid mutilation, public display, or desecration of bodies, as these acts can fuel propaganda, radicalization, or retaliation.
  • Documentation: Record the number of bodies, locations, and any identifying features (e.g., tattoos, documents) for future investigations or potential repatriation requests. This also aids in distinguishing foreign fighters from locals.

2. Public Health Measures

  • Swift Burial: Decomposing bodies pose health risks (e.g., disease outbreaks). Bury remains promptly in designated, secure sites away from water sources or populated areas.
  • Mass Graves: If individual burial is impractical, use marked mass graves with GPS coordinates recorded. Avoid “incognito” burials that erase accountability or complicate future exhumations (e.g., for war crimes tribunals).
  • Protective Gear: Ensure personnel handling bodies use gloves and masks to prevent exposure to pathogens.

3. Religious and Cultural Sensitivity

  • Islamic Burial Rites: Follow basic Islamic practices (e.g., washing, shrouding, facing Mecca) if feasible, even for adversaries. Denying rites risks alienating communities or fueling narratives of state “oppression.”
  • Anonymous Burial: If identities are unknown or unclaimed, bury bodies in unmarked graves but maintain records. This balances dignity with security concerns.

4. Security and Political Considerations

  • Prevent Martyrdom Narratives: Avoid creating burial sites that could become shrines for sympathizers. Use discreet locations and refrain from publicizing coordinates.
  • Community Engagement: Consult local elders and religious leaders to address concerns about burial sites (e.g., proximity to villages) and mitigate stigma.
  • Foreign Fighters: Notify relevant embassies or international organizations (e.g., ICRC) about the deaths, even if repatriation is refused. This fulfills procedural obligations and may deter legal disputes.

5. Coordination with External Actors

  • International Organizations: Partner with the ICRC or Somali Red Crescent to ensure compliance with global norms. They can assist with documentation and dignified burials.
  • Forensic Support: Seek technical help from entities like the UN or African Union to preserve evidence (e.g., DNA samples) for future accountability processes.

6. Environmental Protection

  • Site Selection: Bury bodies in arid, low-traffic areas to minimize groundwater contamination. Avoid ecologically sensitive zones.
  • Use of Lime: In mass graves, apply lime to accelerate decomposition and reduce odor/disease risks.

7. Long-Term Accountability

  • Maintain Records: Archive burial details (locations, photos, identifiers) for potential future exhumations (e.g., war crimes prosecutions or family claims).
  • Transparency: Issue a public statement (without glorifying terrorists) confirming that bodies were handled lawfully and respectfully to counter misinformation.

Case Studies for Guidance

  • Iraq/Syria: Used mass graves for ISIS fighters but faced criticism for poor documentation. Lessons: Prioritize record-keeping and avoid desecration.
  • Mali: Partnered with ICRC to bury jihadist remains anonymously while respecting Islamic rites, reducing community tensions.

Risks to Avoid

  • Summary Disposal: Hasty, unrecorded burials may violate legal norms and complicate post-conflict reconciliation.
  • Politicization: Weaponizing bodies for propaganda (e.g., trophy photos) harms reconciliation and legitimizes extremist narratives.

Recommendation for Puntland

Proceed with prompt, dignified burials in designated sites, adhering to Islamic rites where possible. Document all steps, engage local leaders, and notify international bodies. This approach balances health, legal, and ethical obligations while denying ISIS opportunities to exploit the issue. If feasible, involve neutral actors like the ICRC to lend credibility to the process.

SOMALI REGION OF SOMALILAND HAS NOTHING TO OFFER TO ANYBODY BUT A BEGGING BASKET

WDM EDITORIAL

Somaliland has nothing to offer to anybody except a naval base. That will be legally problematic without Somalia consent. Moreover, the naval base alone doesn’t bring any economic benefits to residents there. It is an illusion that will haunt them sooner.

Historically, Somaliland was a meat supply line for the British military garrison in Aden, Yemen, in the 1920s. That was the only reason it had become a British colony called “BRITISH SOMALILAND PROTECTORATE.” It also acted as a sports vacation for wild games. Neither of these advantages is available today . The Middle East conflict is about to end save Iranian confrontation with the West and Israel, and Somaliland Region has little to offer in that regard. Paradoxically, Somaliland Region is engaged in hosting and funding  ISIS and Al-Shabab in Somalia. This is not an empty rhetoric and unsubstantiated accusation. This is a proven fact and open secret now. Come to Puntland State to witness these revelations as the State Forces continue to crush ISIS bases in the mountains of Calmiskaat (Al-Miskat) in Eastern Somalia in the Horn of Africa.

Lately, some American and British paid lobbyists and recent Internet “bots” have been misleadingly engaged to trick the incoming Trump Administration into recognising this would-be begging basket for a statehood. If that happens, the US will sign on for further political instability in the Horn of Africa and the Middle East. Such a bad policy decision will be worse for America than the Iraq invasion as Somalia and the rest of the African countries will fight back to prevent an opening of a Pandora Box impacting the entire continent and putting African post-independent order into disarray. It is our sincere hope that the Americans are not too guillable to entertain such a stupid idea. Look before you leap is an old adage in the English literature.

Foreign terrorists passed through Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and via Berbera and Hargheisa in Somaliland to Al-Miskat in eastern mountains of Puntland State in the Horn of Africa.

In the US, Michael Rubin, Heritage Foundation, Zio orgs in the US and beyond, and UK MP Gavin Williamson, among others, are national security threats to Somalia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. I have yet to see Villa Somalia or the Ministry of Foreign Affairs launching any protest against these destabilising and provocative persons or foreign institutions meddling in the internal issues of this country. These troublesome foreign entities should be confronted and reminded them to mind their own businesses. Be warned and stay away from Somali internal affairs.