THE ZIONIST UGANDAN PLAN A AND PALESTINIAN PLAN B

bantubiblicalisraelites's avatarBANTU=BIBLICAL ISRAELITES

Before 1948 there was no state of Israel in the Middle East, matter of fact, before 1885 there was no such thing as Middle East, all that land was part of Africa, and Palestine was originally part of the inheritance of the descendants of Misraim. Have you ever came across the document known as “The protocol of the elders of Zion”? It is said that after the Berlin Conference (Kongo conference) in 1884-1885, each of the European nations got their piece of the giant pie, they managed to divide and control the holy land of Africa through the Christian sword. In 1905, a secret meeting was held in Europe by Caucasian elites known as “The protocol of the elders of Zion”, you can find this document online, the agenda of the meeting was to strategically establish a new political state in the heart of Africa in order to control the…

View original post 1,021 more words

Watch “RUSSIA Heading for ECONOMIC OBLIVION According to YALE MANAGEMENT Review on IMPACT OF SANCTIONS” on YouTube

ATTEMPTS TO MARGINALIZE PUNTLAND AND IGNORE ITS PROMINENT POLITICIANS WONT CUT

WDM EDITORIAL

If you think the title of this short article is bit too strong or even biased towards Puntland, stay on your lane like a few others before you, until you learn this fact of Somali politics in the hard way. But, aptitude to change and learn new stuff like common sense is not so common. Puntland State is a major historical part of Somalia with rich cultural heritage of governance and traditions that symbolize ideals of liberalism and tolerance. The State had paid huge sacrifices to re-instate the failed government of Somalia, losing men, minds and material to realize the objective.

Somali politicians who ignored lessons of political history had never been successful. President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) will suffer the same fate, barring fundamental changes in his working relationships with Federal Member States, and especially with Puntland.

Today’s low profile reception for President Mohamud in Garowe by Puntland authorities was not even felt by the residents in town beyond the inconveniences of police temporarily closing some roads to the traffic upon HSM’S arrival. Citizens relate to their leaders based on the common understanding of whether they have champions for people’s causes and issues, or not. HSM doesn’t enjoy even the benefit of the doubt in that regard, given the negative double political perception he had earned in his two terms as president of Somalia. Is HSM redeemable?

Have your say.

WHY PUNTLAND INSTITUTIONS ARE UNDER-PERFORMING

Puntland State has never had mature and effective public institutions due to the fact that its constitution exist by name only and never embedded in the consciousness of its owners, the people. There are mainly three factors holding back the people of Puntland to embrace man-made solemn accord:

1. Some religious elements never accepted the notion of binding agreement between men, which is the foundation of modern statecraft. They keep confusing the general public to come to peaceful harmony and binding civil contract.

2. The nomad doesn’t recognize authority beyond his realm.

3. There is no citizenship in a modern sense in tribal societies. Here there is no collective responsibility towards common good beyond clan interests. For instance, residents of Puntland towns don’t see things differently but along their individual self-interests. What are public institutions meant to such folks?

PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS ARE FOUNDATIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE STATEHOOD

Nothing else matters amid absence of strong public institutions in the life and culture of a nation. Have you ever heard Somali political leaders talking about building institutions? Why not? There must be sinister reasons for avoiding the subject. Any opinion on the matter? Ok, put in another way: Why the military Regime of Siyad Barre had undermined post-independence Somali constitution, parliament and independent judiciary upon taking over the government by coup?

What is the highest public institution in a given country? Parliament, Judiciary, anybody else? Let me remind you that the constitution of a country is the highest and supreme public institution any country could have. The strength of rule of law depends on the loyalty to the constitution. Rate any political leader by his/her attitude towards the letter and spirit of this fundamental public contract. Somalis are familiar with their failed public institutions: The three branches of government in which the Executive Branch acts as winner takes it all, a political culture known in Somalia as Madax-ka-Nool (only the president matters and decides all).

Among public institutions include the State Capital, which is subject to power-sharing in the case of Somalia. There is a growing political culture by residents of Federal and State capitals to use them as political leverages to gain undue influence, power and resources, turning them into Koofka (clan fox-holes). Mogadishu has become the head clan fox-hole, followed by the capitals of Federal Member States. To act as public institutions, these capitals should have public approved legal instruments to safeguard them from Koofka influence, otherwise they aren’t public properties and should be vacated and left alone to their own devices.

Look very hard at Somali Federal and State leaders, follow their speeches, to find out that they don’t intend to leave behind viable public institutions for the survival and continuity of Somalia’s nation-state. They pursue “After me, the dèluge”. “Poor is the nation looking for a hero”.